<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTML 5 turns documents into applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2008/01/31/html-5-turns-documents-into-applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2008/01/31/html-5-turns-documents-into-applications/</link>
	<description>XML, apiculture et pré-vergers</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 10:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cristiano on Tech/Life &#187; My Bookmarks For February 1st - February 6th</title>
		<link>http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2008/01/31/html-5-turns-documents-into-applications/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristiano on Tech/Life &#187; My Bookmarks For February 1st - February 6th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 05:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2008/01/31/html-5-turns-documents-into-applications/#comment-306</guid>
		<description>[...] HTML 5 turns documents into applications - Interesting comparison between HTML5 and XHTML2. I am still in doubt about which of the 2 I like best. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] HTML 5 turns documents into applications - Interesting comparison between HTML5 and XHTML2. I am still in doubt about which of the 2 I like best. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric van der Vlist</title>
		<link>http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2008/01/31/html-5-turns-documents-into-applications/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric van der Vlist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 19:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2008/01/31/html-5-turns-documents-into-applications/#comment-257</guid>
		<description>Hixie: you're perfectly right, applications and documents are "extremes along a big spectrum" but that means that we have to keep a balance between these two and I am worried that HTML5 is not balanced enough.

This is the most important point that I have covered in my post but there are a few others and I'll try to formalize each of them individually and submit them more formally to the HTML Working Group.

Thanks for your answer!

Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hixie: you&#8217;re perfectly right, applications and documents are &#8220;extremes along a big spectrum&#8221; but that means that we have to keep a balance between these two and I am worried that HTML5 is not balanced enough.</p>
<p>This is the most important point that I have covered in my post but there are a few others and I&#8217;ll try to formalize each of them individually and submit them more formally to the HTML Working Group.</p>
<p>Thanks for your answer!</p>
<p>Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Hickson</title>
		<link>http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2008/01/31/html-5-turns-documents-into-applications/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Hickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2008/01/31/html-5-turns-documents-into-applications/#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Would I be correct in summarising your complaint as a fear that HTML5 leads HTML to cater more for applications than documents?

If so, then I think this is a misunderstanding. HTML5 does indeed cater for Web applications; that's a large part of its focus (the spec used to be called "Web Application 1.0" before the W3C renamed it). However, it also focuses on documents, for example with the introduction of a number of elements for marking up document semantics like &#60;article&#62;, &#60;footer&#62;, etc.

If your fear is that HTML should not cater for applications at all, I think that ship sailed long ago. GMail, vBulletin, WordPress, etc, are just the tip of the iceberg. HTML has long been used for a wide spectrum of pages ranging from pure documents to pure applications with a lot in between. Earlier versions of HTML had forms; HTML5 is similarly making small steps to address the needs that authors have found while using HTML in that way.

I think it's wrong to view Applications and Documents as opposites. They are merely labels for different extremes along a big spectrum. For example, is this blog page an application or a document? It's both, and so the underlying language should treat it as both.

BTW, your input is very welcome, to both the HTML working group and the XHTML2 working group, both of which have charters allowing anyone to join. http://www.w3.org/html/wg/ http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would I be correct in summarising your complaint as a fear that HTML5 leads HTML to cater more for applications than documents?</p>
<p>If so, then I think this is a misunderstanding. HTML5 does indeed cater for Web applications; that&#8217;s a large part of its focus (the spec used to be called &#8220;Web Application 1.0&#8243; before the W3C renamed it). However, it also focuses on documents, for example with the introduction of a number of elements for marking up document semantics like &lt;article&gt;, &lt;footer&gt;, etc.</p>
<p>If your fear is that HTML should not cater for applications at all, I think that ship sailed long ago. GMail, vBulletin, WordPress, etc, are just the tip of the iceberg. HTML has long been used for a wide spectrum of pages ranging from pure documents to pure applications with a lot in between. Earlier versions of HTML had forms; HTML5 is similarly making small steps to address the needs that authors have found while using HTML in that way.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s wrong to view Applications and Documents as opposites. They are merely labels for different extremes along a big spectrum. For example, is this blog page an application or a document? It&#8217;s both, and so the underlying language should treat it as both.</p>
<p>BTW, your input is very welcome, to both the HTML working group and the XHTML2 working group, both of which have charters allowing anyone to join. <a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/" rel="nofollow">http://www.w3.org/html/wg/</a> <a href="http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/" rel="nofollow">http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: see whatever&#8230; &#187; HTML5 or XHTML 2.0</title>
		<link>http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2008/01/31/html-5-turns-documents-into-applications/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>see whatever&#8230; &#187; HTML5 or XHTML 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 12:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2008/01/31/html-5-turns-documents-into-applications/#comment-254</guid>
		<description>[...] interesing notes by Eric van der Vlist about HTML5 versus XHTML 2.0. I did not partake in the WHATWG (which would be an option - I know) nor do I know both specs in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] interesing notes by Eric van der Vlist about HTML5 versus XHTML 2.0. I did not partake in the WHATWG (which would be an option - I know) nor do I know both specs in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric van der Vlist</title>
		<link>http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2008/01/31/html-5-turns-documents-into-applications/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric van der Vlist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 07:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2008/01/31/html-5-turns-documents-into-applications/#comment-250</guid>
		<description>Gautier: content de voir que le plugin OpenId fonctionne bien! Merci pour ton commentaire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gautier: content de voir que le plugin OpenId fonctionne bien! Merci pour ton commentaire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HTML5 IRC logs</title>
		<link>http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2008/01/31/html-5-turns-documents-into-applications/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>HTML5 IRC logs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 07:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2008/01/31/html-5-turns-documents-into-applications/#comment-249</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Thanks but no thanks...&lt;/strong&gt;

# [02:27] &#60;Hixie&gt; so i don't really understand what that article is saying, other than apologising for xml, except maybe that html5 should not define interop as much as it does

# [02:27] &#60;Hixie&gt; in which case my response to that feedback would have to be "Thanks but no thanks".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Thanks but no thanks&#8230;</strong></p>
<p># [02:27] &lt;Hixie> so i don&#8217;t really understand what that article is saying, other than apologising for xml, except maybe that html5 should not define interop as much as it does</p>
<p># [02:27] &lt;Hixie> in which case my response to that feedback would have to be &#8220;Thanks but no thanks&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gautier Poupeau</title>
		<link>http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2008/01/31/html-5-turns-documents-into-applications/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Gautier Poupeau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 07:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2008/01/31/html-5-turns-documents-into-applications/#comment-248</guid>
		<description>Merci Eric !! Tu fais les bons rappels au bon moment. HTML 5 est typiquement l'exemple de format de structuration de l'information mis au point par des informaticiens, c'est la cata... Il faudra que je réussisse à trouver le temps pour compléter tes propos sur l'idiotie des balises du type  et autre , j'ai failli m'étrangler en lisant cela...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merci Eric !! Tu fais les bons rappels au bon moment. HTML 5 est typiquement l&#8217;exemple de format de structuration de l&#8217;information mis au point par des informaticiens, c&#8217;est la cata&#8230; Il faudra que je réussisse à trouver le temps pour compléter tes propos sur l&#8217;idiotie des balises du type  et autre , j&#8217;ai failli m&#8217;étrangler en lisant cela&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
