<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our Web 2.0 book appears to be tough to classify</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2006/12/04/5136_our_web_20_book_appears_to_be_tough_to_classify/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2006/12/04/5136_our_web_20_book_appears_to_be_tough_to_classify/</link>
	<description>XML, apiculture et pré-vergers</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric van der Vlist</title>
		<link>http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2006/12/04/5136_our_web_20_book_appears_to_be_tough_to_classify/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric van der Vlist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/?p=78#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Karl,

Yes, that can be a reason.

To their defence, I must say that their job is not easy. While we all know that a single treelike classification isn't enough and that we need graphs to categorize books, the physical bookshelves on which they present books support only a single dimensional projection of a simple treelike classification!

Makes me think that it would be interesting to see if they can take profit of the fact that bookshelves are actually two dimensional but I guess that this would be quite complex to take into account.

Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karl,</p>
<p>Yes, that can be a reason.</p>
<p>To their defence, I must say that their job is not easy. While we all know that a single treelike classification isn&#8217;t enough and that we need graphs to categorize books, the physical bookshelves on which they present books support only a single dimensional projection of a simple treelike classification!</p>
<p>Makes me think that it would be interesting to see if they can take profit of the fact that bookshelves are actually two dimensional but I guess that this would be quite complex to take into account.</p>
<p>Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karl</title>
		<link>http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2006/12/04/5136_our_web_20_book_appears_to_be_tough_to_classify/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/?p=78#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Because employees of booksupermarkets are not always librarians or book lovers. Maybe more chance in a bookshop ;)

I had the issue a lot of time when I was doing astrophysics and you had books of astrology. *SIGH*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because employees of booksupermarkets are not always librarians or book lovers. Maybe more chance in a bookshop <img src='http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I had the issue a lot of time when I was doing astrophysics and you had books of astrology. *SIGH*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
