<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is XML 2.0 doomed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2005/01/05/561_is_xml_20_doomed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2005/01/05/561_is_xml_20_doomed/</link>
	<description>XML, apiculture et prés-vergers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:28:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: xml 1.0 - StartTags.com</title>
		<link>http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2005/01/05/561_is_xml_20_doomed/#comment-60058</link>
		<dc:creator>xml 1.0 - StartTags.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/?p=22#comment-60058</guid>
		<description>[...] with XML 1.0 because an XML 1.0 processor can&#039;t understand these characters so it will fault. ... Is XML 2.0 doomed?XML 2.0 seems to be becoming the new buzzword and hot topic among many forums. ... XML 1.0 is very [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with XML 1.0 because an XML 1.0 processor can&#8217;t understand these characters so it will fault. &#8230; Is XML 2.0 doomed?XML 2.0 seems to be becoming the new buzzword and hot topic among many forums. &#8230; XML 1.0 is very [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

