<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RDDL 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2004/01/18/514_rddl_20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2004/01/18/514_rddl_20/</link>
	<description>XML, apiculture et pré-vergers</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric van der Vlist</title>
		<link>http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/2004/01/18/514_rddl_20/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric van der Vlist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog/?p=6#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Note that the new proposal has been moved to http://www.rddl.org/rddl2 "until we get some consensus on whether to either keep the same namespace for RDDL, or to use another".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that the new proposal has been moved to <a href="http://www.rddl.org/rddl2" rel="nofollow">http://www.rddl.org/rddl2</a> &#8220;until we get some consensus on whether to either keep the same namespace for RDDL, or to use another&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
